[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest
From: |
Gavin Smith |
Subject: |
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Oct 2022 21:01:01 +0100 |
On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 10:38:07PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> No, those #undef's must be after including perl.h and before XSUB.h.
> That's because the Gnulib's stdlib.h is included by Perl's perl.h:
I've revised it in commit 5edc09c5bd.
> > So I expect we can deal with putenv and mktemp the same way. (I haven't
> > investigated why Gnulib wants to redefine 'free'.)
> >
> > It could be worth asking on bug-gnulib again.
>
> OK, so I guess those #undef's might not be needed?
If you can confirm that the warnings are gone with the lines
GL_GNULIB_MDA_FDOPEN=0
GL_GNULIB_MDA_MKTEMP=0
GL_GNULIB_MDA_PUTENV=0
(added in commit 02022a38e48) then we can ask on bug-gnulib if this
is right and the GL_ prefix should be used now.
The free redefinition was from the 'free-posix' module that the
'vasnprintf' module depends on. From the Gnulib ChangeLog:
2021-03-25 Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
free-posix: use more often in other modules
This lets us simplify cleanup code that calls ‘free’.
I doubt there is much hope of stopping this redefinition from gnulib
so "#undef free" may be the best solution here.
Since I only do it after a year or more, I never get any faster at
tracking down what gnulib modules are responsible.
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest and BSD make, Bruno Haible, 2022/10/22
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest on macOS, Bruno Haible, 2022/10/22
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest on OpenSolaris, Bruno Haible, 2022/10/22