Re: Skip filename recoding tests on MS-Windows

[pertusus]

On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 05:54:30PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2022 14:44:33 +0200
> > From: pertusus@free.fr
> > Cc: GavinSmith0123@gmail.com, bug-texinfo@gnu.org
> > 
> > I think that it does not depend on other changes.  You'll also need to
> > remove input_file_names_recoded_stamp.txt manually, or it will remain
> > with FAIL even if it now succeeds.
> 
> Running the test suite with "FAILED" in that file produces a few
> failures:
> 
>   FAIL: test_scripts/formatting_non_ascii_command_line.sh
>   FAIL: test_scripts/formatting_non_ascii_test_epub.sh
>   FAIL: test_scripts/formatting_non_ascii_test_rawtext.sh
>   FAIL: test_scripts/formatting_non_ascii_no_setfilename_test_rawtext.sh
>   FAIL: test_scripts/formatting_non_ascii_test_latex.sh
>   FAIL: input_dir_non_ascii.sh
>   FAIL: output_dir_non_ascii.sh
>   FAIL: output_dir_file_non_ascii.sh
> 
> Sounds like all of these should be disabled if there's FAILED in that
> file?

No, these do not need the latin1 encoded file.  All those cases are
failed because there are encoded arguments on the command line, and it
is probably the sshell that mangles the names.

> And this failure:
> 
>   FAIL: test_scripts/layout_formatting_epub_nodes.sh
> 
> is because of the backslash issue?

I think so, in line with the option: -c INFO_JS_DIR=js

> Or am I confused (in which case
> where are the tests in the 'layout' directory in the "make check"
> run?)?

The input files, the results or the references?  Input files are in
general in the layout directory, but could also be in other locations,
the raw outputs are in layout/raw_out_parser, the output compared to the
reference is in layout/out_parser and the references are in
layout/res_parser.

-- 
Pat