[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Texinfo manual: typos and English usage
From: |
Vincent Lefevre |
Subject: |
Re: Texinfo manual: typos and English usage |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Oct 2022 11:57:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.2.7+51 (a318ca5a) vl-149028 (2022-10-21) |
On 2022-10-28 09:32:10 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 02:53:17 +0200
> > From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net>
> >
> > The @code{makeinfo} program automatically determines node pointers
> > for a hierarchically organized document. For it do to do this, each
> > @code{@@node} command should be followed immediately by a sectioning
> > command such as @code{@@chapter} or @code{@@section} (except that
> > comment lines may intervene). Finally, you must follow the `Top'
> > [...]
> >
> > Concerning "For it do to do this", I suppose that the first "do"
> > should not be there. But it is still a bit difficult to parse and
> > it should be simplified, IMHO. Replace it by "To this end"?
>
> IMO, "To this end" is more abstract, and thus risks losing
> continuity. I personally find nothing wrong with the original wording
> (except for the redundant "do", of course), but if clarification is
> still desired, my suggestion would be to make it more specific, not
> less specific. For example:
>
> The @code{makeinfo} program can automatically determine node pointers
> for a hierarchically organized document. But for @code{makeinfo} to
> be able to do that, each @code{@@node} command should be followed
> immediately by a sectioning command such as @code{@@chapter} [...]
Yes, this would look better, IMHO.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)