[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN)
From: |
Patrice Dumas |
Subject: |
Re: better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN) |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Nov 2022 11:48:47 +0100 |
On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 08:47:32AM +0000, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> [texinfo.tex 2022-11-07.17]
>
>
> I suggest to change the mapping for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN) to use
> `@textdegree{}`.
>
> ```
> \input texinfo
>
> @code{45°}
>
> @code{45@textdegree{}}
>
> @bye
> ```
It is better to be consistent in my opinion. Here is a proposed patch,
it does not use @textdegree but leads to the same output as @textdegree{}.
It fails in @math{}, but the preceding mapping also failed in @math.
> As this small example document shows, the results look better even
> with typewriter IMHO. Of course, the glyph width must be adjusted for
> typewriter, which I haven't done here.
I do not think that it is done for @textdegree{}, nor for many
substitutions of non-ascii characters. The previous mapping got a
fixed-width, though, as it used a space accented with a ringaccent.
--
Pat
textdegree.diff
Description: Text Data
- better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN), Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/11
- Re: better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN),
Patrice Dumas <=
- Re: better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN), Gavin Smith, 2022/11/11
- Re: better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN), Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/12
- Re: better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN), Gavin Smith, 2022/11/12
- Re: better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN), Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/12
- Re: better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN), Gavin Smith, 2022/11/12
- Re: better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN), Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/12