[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN)
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN) |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Nov 2022 12:03:11 +0000 (UTC) |
>> ```
>> \input texinfo
>>
>> @code{45°}
>>
>> @code{45@textdegree{}}
>>
>> @bye
>> ```
>
> It is better to be consistent in my opinion.
Consistent with what exactly?
> Here is a proposed patch, it does not use @textdegree but leads to
> the same output as @textdegree{}. It fails in @math{}, but the
> preceding mapping also failed in @math.
Does this map back to U+00B0 for cut and paste?
>> Of course, the glyph width must be adjusted for typewriter, which I
>> haven't done here.
>
> I do not think that it is done for @textdegree{}, nor for many
> substitutions of non-ascii characters. The previous mapping got a
> fixed-width, though, as it used a space accented with a ringaccent.
Well, I think it is *essential* in typewriter to get the same width as
all other glyphs if entered as U+00BO. Otherwise code listings look
bad. In other words, there is a difference between entering U+00B0
and `@textdegree{}`: The former *must* be fixed-width, the latter
can be non-fixed-width also.
AFAICS, your patch doesn't do that, so I disagree with it.
Werner
- better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN), Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/11
- Re: better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN), Gavin Smith, 2022/11/11
- Re: better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN), Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/12
- Re: better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN), Gavin Smith, 2022/11/12
- Re: better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN), Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/12
- Re: better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN), Gavin Smith, 2022/11/12
- Re: better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN), Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/12
- Re: better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN), Gavin Smith, 2022/11/12