[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Within `@code`, `@-` and `@/` are handled the same
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Within `@code`, `@-` and `@/` are handled the same |
Date: |
Tue, 06 Dec 2022 07:52:46 +0000 (UTC) |
[texinfo.tex 2022-12-04.16]
Consider this example.
```
\input texinfo
This is a @code{Long@-Long@-Word};
this is a @code{Long@-Long@-Word};
this is a @code{Long@-Long@-Word};
this is a @code{Long@-Long@-Word};
this is a @code{Long@-Long@-Word};
this is a @code{Long@-Long@-Word};
this is a @code{Long@-Long@-Word};
this is a @code{Long@-Long@-Word};
this is a @code{Long@-Long@-Word};
this is a @code{Long@-Long@-Word};
this is a @code{Long@-Long@-Word};
this is a @code{Long@-Long@-Word};
this is a @code{Long@-Long@-Word};
this is a @code{Long@-Long@-Word};
this is a @code{Long@-Long@-Word}.
@bye
```
As can be seen in the attached output, there is no hyphen in the split
word. I consider this a bug, since there is zero reason for such a
surprising (and undocumented) behaviour.
BTW, you get exactly the same output if you replace `@code` with `@t`
– and *this* is definitely a bug :-)
Werner
- Within `@code`, `@-` and `@/` are handled the same,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: Within `@code`, `@-` and `@/` are handled the same, Gavin Smith, 2022/12/07
- Re: Within `@code`, `@-` and `@/` are handled the same, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/12/15
- Re: Within `@code`, `@-` and `@/` are handled the same, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/12/15
- Re: Within `@code`, `@-` and `@/` are handled the same, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/12/16
- Re: Within `@code`, `@-` and `@/` are handled the same, Gavin Smith, 2022/12/17
- Re: Within `@code`, `@-` and `@/` are handled the same, Gavin Smith, 2022/12/17
- Re: Within `@code`, `@-` and `@/` are handled the same, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/12/17