Re: wget-1.21.3-win32/64

[WQ]

To be 100% sure I retested it with wget

32bit :


64bit :


So we know it's not 32/64 related


On 31/05/2022 15:12, gerdd@mweb.co.za wrote:
> @WQ,
>
> now that's impressive!
>
> I still wonder how that came about,though ...
>
>
> @Tim,
>
> as soon a I have a moment I will take that exe and try it out with my 
> use cases and any new options that might be useful to me.
>
> Anything interesting, I'll let you know.
>
> Gerd
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From: *"WQ" <wquatan@belgacom.net>
> *To: *"Tim Ruehsen" <tim.ruehsen@gmx.de>, gerdd@mweb.co.za
> *Cc: *"bug-wget" <bug-wget@gnu.org>, "darnir" <darnir@gnu.org>
> *Sent: *Tuesday, May 31, 2022 2:35:41 PM
> *Subject: *Re: wget-1.21.3-win32/64
>
> Hi,
>
> I just tested the wget2 executable on my Win10 with exactly the same 
> command : *wget2.exe -O TargetPath\TargetFile http://source*
>
> And now it's working everywhere, *even on the Netgear* !!!!
>
>
>
> As you can see, I now get the original DateTme-stamp under all 
> circmstances.
> So that's great news, and will start to use wget2 from now on.
>
> But, to be clear, I did not do any other tests, so I can't tell if all 
> wget2 functionality is working properly.
>
> Thanks for having informed about the exe !
>
> Kind regards
>
> Walter
>
> On 31/05/2022 12:54, Tim Rühsen wrote:
>
>     On 30.05.22 14:57, WQ wrote:
>
>         Hi,
>
>         Thank you for having replied anyway !
>
>         The testing I did was always with the same server and file. So
>         I'm 100% sure about the results (different behaviour on the
>         Netgear)
>         When I wrote "path/file" then I did mean something like
>         F:\Download\thefile.txt
>         I know the documented -O feature, but it remains unclear why
>         the original datetime works locally and on the Thecus, even if
>         it should not (as documented)
>         When a local wget (with/without -O) is done followed by a move
>         to the Netgear, the time-stamp is ok, I tested that before
>         too. But I'm trying to avoid the move as this involves extra
>         time, especially with giga-files.
>         Yes, a real renaming mechanism, is a missing option.
>
>         I didn't know about wget2, but it seems there are no compiled
>         versions available.
>
>
>     With the latest release of wget2 (v2.0.1), there is a .exe version
>     available. It doesn't have all features yet, but hopefully works.
>     I can only test it with a Windows emulation (wine) on Linux.
>
>     Go to the bottom at https://gitlab.com/gnuwget/wget2/-/tags/v2.0.1
>
>     Regards, Tim