[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] r5rs compliance (part i)
|
From: |
Alex Shinn |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] r5rs compliance (part i) |
|
Date: |
Wed, 05 Aug 2009 12:18:36 +0900 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (darwin) |
Thomas Bushnell BSG <address@hidden> writes:
> Chicken does have rationals, though it does not have
> *exact* rationals,
Well, yes, technically it does:
(rational? 2) => #t
For any formal langauge you should say it doesn't have
exact, non-integer rationals.
--
Alex