[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: Numbers egg interaction with other compiled co
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: Numbers egg interaction with other compiled code. |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:34:04 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Tony Sidaway scripsit:
> So if we redefine negative? to do something wonderful with bignums,
> then everywhere in the program that has access to the binding
> "negative?" should see the change. No?
No, because the egg doesn't redefine the global definition of negative?,
it just rebinds the identifier locally to the module that invokes it.
--
John Cowan address@hidden http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Any day you get all five woodpeckers is a good day. --Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Numbers egg interaction with other compiled code., (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Numbers egg interaction with other compiled code., Tony Sidaway, 2009/10/21
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Numbers egg interaction with other compiled code., John Cowan, 2009/10/21
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Numbers egg interaction with other compiled code., Tony Sidaway, 2009/10/23
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Numbers egg interaction with other compiled code., Alex Shinn, 2009/10/23
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Numbers egg interaction with other compiled code., John Cowan, 2009/10/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Numbers egg interaction with other compiled code., Tony Sidaway, 2009/10/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Numbers egg interaction with other compiled code., John Cowan, 2009/10/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Numbers egg interaction with other compiled code., Tony Sidaway, 2009/10/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Numbers egg interaction with other compiled code., Tony Sidaway, 2009/10/24
[Chicken-hackers] Re: Numbers egg interaction with other compiled code., Tony Sidaway, 2009/10/21
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: Numbers egg interaction with other compiled code.,
John Cowan <=