[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] numbers stuff
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] numbers stuff |
Date: |
Mon, 18 May 2015 12:49:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:39:36PM +0200, address@hidden wrote:
> Hi, Peter!
>
>
> I pushed a small change to numbers-integration-scratchspace, please
> take a look. During build, the scrutinizer produced a warning, due
> to the use of "fp=" in "XXX-time->seconds". I changed this to use "="
> instead, because otherwise the conversion produces an error.
Thanks! I noticed that because vandusen faithfully announced the commit :)
Looks good to me.
> Another question: should "C_num_to_long" and "C_num_to_unsigned_long"
> handle bignums? The same goes for "C_i_foreign_integer..." and
> friends?
hm, they probably should. I suppose I overlooked them. I though
only C_num_to_int was used.
Cheers,
Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] numbers stuff,
Peter Bex <=