[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Remove comparator type specializations for
|
From: |
Evan Hanson |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Remove comparator type specializations for zero and one arguments |
|
Date: |
Fri, 12 Jun 2015 16:59:15 +1200 |
On 2015-06-01 20:23, Peter Bex wrote:
> Here's a patch to restore allowance of zero or single argument calls
> of numeric comparator procedures in CHICKEN 5.
Looks good, pushed. It's a bit odd now that `(<= "foo")` will signal an
error when `(<= 2 1 "foo")` won't, since it could be argued that the
first form might short-circuit when there's only one argument. However,
it feels more correct to me to leave the argument type check.
Thanks,
Evan
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature