Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add unexport form for modules

[Kooda]

On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 22:07:56 +0200 Peter Bex <address@hidden>
wrote:
> Both these proposals make me very very uneasy, for slightly different
> but somewhat related reasons.

I strongly agree with you on these points. How CHICKEN’s module
definition works always seemed strange to me.

R7RS is probably what we should strive for, therefore I’m in favor of
doing what we can to improve compatibility with it.

Also, R7RS library forms make explicit everything about the defined
module. Which is, I think, an important property.