[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-hackers] food for thought - a tentative change proposal
From: |
Jörg F . Wittenberger |
Subject: |
[Chicken-hackers] food for thought - a tentative change proposal |
Date: |
21 Dec 2018 20:30:31 +0100 |
Hi all,
attached patch is not yet in final shape. I just want to put it up as food
for though.
It should apply atop of b2caefa738.
If you ever scratched your head about issues of signal handlers running
within threads not suspecting that, limitations wrt. synchronization
primitives likes mutexes being usable from within signal handlers, this
change might be for you. Once this is cleaned up and debugged, there should
be no limitations as to what might be run from signal handlers.
The commit message has more details.
I encourage you to try this. While it does change semantics, I strongly
believe it changes them for the better.
Now I need to learn what damage it does.
Merry Christmas
/Jörg
0001-Forward-interrupts-to-dedicated-thread-when-schedule.patch
Description: 0001-Forward-interrupts-to-dedicated-thread-when-schedule.patch
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Chicken-hackers] food for thought - a tentative change proposal,
Jörg F . Wittenberger <=