Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #1633 by detecting nonexistent field names (typos) in constructor a

[kooda]

Peter Bex <address@hidden> wrote:
> Here's a relatively straightforward patch for #1633; we simply walk the
> constructor's arguments and check that there's a matching field
> definition for it.  If not, bail out with syntax-error.

Cool! Pushed!