[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cp-patches] Re: Absolute URL parsing bug
From: |
Chris Burdess |
Subject: |
Re: [cp-patches] Re: Absolute URL parsing bug |
Date: |
Sat, 2 Jul 2005 21:41:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
Tom Tromey wrote:
> Andrew> I have no opinions about the syntax of URIs, I only want to make
> Andrew> real-world applications work. In this case we have to guess what Java
> Andrew> libraries are doing.
>
> FWIW we've had some patch churn in this area in the past.
> It would be excellent to have a set of Mauve tests so that future
> changes don't break things that we know need to work. In particular
> at least the current case should be added.
Perhaps we should also get some feedback from the W3C URI team on how
they feel the APIs apply to the concepts?
--
Chris Burdess
- [cp-patches] Re: Absolute URL parsing bug, (continued)
- [cp-patches] Re: Absolute URL parsing bug, Per Bothner, 2005/07/01
- [cp-patches] Re: Absolute URL parsing bug, Andrew Haley, 2005/07/02
- [cp-patches] Re: Absolute URL parsing bug, Per Bothner, 2005/07/02
- [cp-patches] Re: Absolute URL parsing bug, Andrew Haley, 2005/07/04
- [cp-patches] Re: Absolute URL parsing bug, Andrew Haley, 2005/07/04
- Re: [cp-patches] Re: Absolute URL parsing bug, Mark Wielaard, 2005/07/05
- Re: [cp-patches] Re: Absolute URL parsing bug, Andrew Haley, 2005/07/05
- Re: [cp-patches] Re: Absolute URL parsing bug, Andrew Haley, 2005/07/07
- [cp-patches] Re: Absolute URL parsing bug, Per Bothner, 2005/07/05
- [cp-patches] Re: Absolute URL parsing bug, Tom Tromey, 2005/07/02
- Re: [cp-patches] Re: Absolute URL parsing bug,
Chris Burdess <=
- Re: [cp-patches] Re: Absolute URL parsing bug, Andrew Haley, 2005/07/03