[cp-patches] Re: Qt-peers and AC_PROG_CXX

[Tom Tromey]

>>>>> "Norman" == Norman Hendrich <address@hidden> writes:

Norman> 1)  Is there any deep reason why the AC_PROG_CXX test is commented out?
Norman> 2a) If not, could somebody with write access please reinstate it?

I'm checking in the appended.
I don't think this should hurt, and I couldn't think of a reason it
ought to be disabled.

Tom

Index: ChangeLog
from  Tom Tromey  <address@hidden>

        * configure.ac: Call AC_PROG_CXX.

Index: configure.ac
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/classpath/classpath/configure.ac,v
retrieving revision 1.103
diff -u -r1.103 configure.ac
--- configure.ac 24 Aug 2005 22:38:46 -0000 1.103
+++ configure.ac 25 Aug 2005 13:49:42 -0000
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@
 dnl -----------------------------------------------------------
 dnl Checks for programs.
 dnl -----------------------------------------------------------
-dnl AC_PROG_CXX
+AC_PROG_CXX
 dnl Initialize libtool
 AC_DISABLE_STATIC
 AC_PROG_LIBTOOL