[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SWING at OJE
From: |
Jeff Sturm |
Subject: |
Re: SWING at OJE |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Feb 2001 12:07:39 -0500 |
"Etienne M. Gagnon" wrote:
> Can you explain to me in what CNI is better than JNI, at the binary
> level? In what can CNI be faster than JNI while remaining VM
> independent?
CNI is not VM independent. It was designed for gcj. It's fast because there is
really no overhead: C++ classes can directly access Java methods and fields, for
instance.
http://gcc.gnu.org/java/papers/cni/t1.html
--
Jeff Sturm
address@hidden
Re: SWING at OJE, Nic Ferrier, 2001/02/05
Re: SWING at OJE, Nic Ferrier, 2001/02/05