[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re (2): testing before a release
From: |
Etienne M. Gagnon |
Subject: |
Re: Re (2): testing before a release |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Nov 2001 11:44:07 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.23i |
Hi Patrick,
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 05:30:05PM +0100, address@hidden wrote:
> This sounds very scary to me! If it would be the case, I should seriously
> reconsider which libraries to use with my VM, as I'm not 100% sure yet that
> I can release it with the GPL (the legal dept. of our university
> has to say the last word)
>
> Can anybody prove or reject this assertion?
From the GPL FAQ ( http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#IfLibraryIsGPL ):
Q: If a library is released under the GPL (not the LGPL), does that mean that
any program which uses it has to be under the GPL?
A: Yes, because the program as it is actually run includes the library.
Etienne
--
Etienne M. Gagnon http://www.info.uqam.ca/~egagnon/
SableVM: http://www.sablevm.org/
SableCC: http://www.sablecc.org/
- Re (2): testing before a release, reali, 2001/11/07
- Re: Re (2): testing before a release,
Etienne M. Gagnon <=
- Re: Re (2): testing before a release, Brian Jones, 2001/11/07
- Re: Re (2): testing before a release, Per Bothner, 2001/11/07
- Re: Re (2): testing before a release, Fred Gray, 2001/11/08
- Re: Re (2): testing before a release, Mark Wielaard, 2001/11/09
- Re: Re (2): testing before a release, Etienne M. Gagnon, 2001/11/09
- Re: Re (2): testing before a release, Mark Wielaard, 2001/11/16
- Re: Re (2): testing before a release, Etienne M. Gagnon, 2001/11/16
- Re: Re (2): testing before a release, Stuart Ballard, 2001/11/16
- Re: Re (2): testing before a release, Etienne M. Gagnon, 2001/11/16