[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Clarification to the license of Classpath (excluding the AWT code)
From: |
Etienne M. Gagnon |
Subject: |
Clarification to the license of Classpath (excluding the AWT code) |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Nov 2001 11:37:05 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:0.9.5) Gecko/20011023 |
Hi Richard,
Over the last week, there was discussions on the Classpath mailing-list about
the license of Classpath for non-AWT code. [I know there are some discussions
about the license for AWT code; the current message has no relation to those
discussions].
We have identified an important ambiguity (or probably "bug") in the current
Classpath license. I am writing this message to explain our concerns and
propose a simple solution. It was agreed, on the Classpath mailing-list, that
if you approved of the solution, it would probably be adopted.
The problem
===========
Classpath (except the AWT code) is licensed under the GNU GPL plus the following
license:
--- BEGIN ---
As a special exception, if you link this library with other files to
produce an executable, this library does not by itself cause the
resulting executable to be covered by the GNU General Public License.
This exception does not however invalidate any other reasons why the
executable file might be covered by the GNU General Public License.
--- END ---
Unlike the text of the Guile license and the text proposed for GPL exceptions in
the GPL FAQ (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#WritingFSWithNFLibs), this
exception does not give an "explicit" permission to apply it to derivative work.
In fact, the following sentence of the Classpath exception seems to indicate
that ** modifications ** to Classpath are solely subject to the terms of the GNU
GPL:
"This exception does not however invalidate any other reasons why the executable
file might be covered by the GNU General Public License"
The consequence is that, if somebody (other than the copyright holder) modifies
Classpath, then the modified version must be licensed under the terms of the
GNU GPL. As there is no explicit permission to extend the the Classpath
exception to derivative work, the modified Classpath is thus licensed under the
"pure" GPL (i.e. no exception).
If I understand clearly the "intent" of the Classpath exception, forcing
derivative work into the "pure" GNU GPL (no exception) was not the goal of this
license. In fact, you have yourself asserted this to me in a previous message,
and other Classpath/libgcj project leaders (including Per Brothner) also think
it sould be permitted to apply the exception to derivative work.
The Solution
============
To solve this ambiguity (or probably "bug" in the exception text), I suggest to
add the following text to the Classpath exception, giving ** explicit **
permission to carry the exception to derivative work, as originally intended:
"Note that people who make modified versions of Classpath are not
obligated to grant this special exception for their modified versions;
it is their choice whether to do so. The GNU General Public License
gives permission to release a modified version without this exception;
this exception also makes it possible to release a modified version
which carries forward this exception."
[You will notice that this text is extracted from a license you suggested to me
for SableVM; you are the author of this text.]
So, in summary, what I suggest is to replace the current Classpath exception by
the following unambiguous text:
--- BEGIN ---
As a special exception, if you link this library with other files to
produce an executable, this library does not by itself cause the
resulting executable to be covered by the GNU General Public License.
This exception does not however invalidate any other reasons why the
executable file might be covered by the GNU General Public License.
Note that people who make modified versions of Classpath are not
obligated to grant this special exception for their modified versions;
it is their choice whether to do so. The GNU General Public License
gives permission to release a modified version without this exception;
this exception also makes it possible to release a modified version
which carries forward this exception.
--- END ---
Would you agree that the license of Classpath (non-AWT code) be changed to the
GPL plus the above exception?
Or, if you disagree to the above change, could you please explain why?
Thanks,
Etienne
[This message is CC'ed to the address@hidden mailing-list].
--
Etienne M. Gagnon http://www.info.uqam.ca/~egagnon/
SableVM: http://www.sablevm.org/
SableCC: http://www.sablecc.org/
- Clarification to the license of Classpath (excluding the AWT code),
Etienne M. Gagnon <=