Re: The need for clarifying the GPL exception (unfortunately)

[Brian Jones]

"Etienne M. Gagnon" <address@hidden> writes:

> --- BEGIN ---
> As a special exception, if you link this library with other files to
> produce an executable, this library does not by itself cause the
> resulting executable to be covered by the GNU General Public License.
> This exception does not however invalidate any other reasons why the
> executable file might be covered by the GNU General Public License.
> If you modify this library, you may extend this exception to your version
> of the library but you are not obligated to do so.  If you do not wish to
> do so, delete this exception statement from your version.
> --- END ---
> 
> Is this better?

I think so.  Anyone think this is better with regards to gcj?

Brian
-- 
Brian Jones <address@hidden>