[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: java.net.URI implementation
From: |
Etienne M. Gagnon |
Subject: |
Re: java.net.URI implementation |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Feb 2003 12:12:04 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.3i |
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 06:47:57PM +0200, Giannis Georgalis wrote:
> I agree with you. I found JFlex <http://www.jflex.de>, that is *much*
> faster than a hand-written scanner, as the benchmarks below
> show. JFlex is under the GPL, so there's no problem in using it for
> classpath.
GPL scares me... (Classpath == GPL+Excecption != GPL)
Can't you use SableCC or ANTLR? (Or any other Free Software that would
not impose the "pure" GPL on Classpath).
Etienne
--
Etienne M. Gagnon, Ph.D. http://www.info.uqam.ca/~egagnon/
SableVM: http://www.sablevm.org/
SableCC: http://www.sablecc.org/
- java.net.URI implementation, Giannis Georgalis, 2003/02/10
- Re: java.net.URI implementation, Brian Jones, 2003/02/10
- Re: java.net.URI implementation, Giannis Georgalis, 2003/02/10
- Re: java.net.URI implementation, Per Bothner, 2003/02/10
- Re: java.net.URI implementation, Giannis Georgalis, 2003/02/10
- Re: java.net.URI implementation, Per Bothner, 2003/02/10
- Re: java.net.URI implementation, Giannis Georgalis, 2003/02/10
- Re: java.net.URI implementation, Per Bothner, 2003/02/10
Re: java.net.URI implementation, Stephen Crawley, 2003/02/10