[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: /classpath java/awt/font/OpenType.java ChangeLog
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: /classpath java/awt/font/OpenType.java ChangeLog |
Date: |
12 Aug 2003 10:30:35 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
>>>>> "Sascha" == Sascha Brawer <address@hidden> writes:
Sascha> I know about the implicit modifiers for interface fields, but
Sascha> I am a bit surprised that omitting them would be our coding
Sascha> standard. Is it a good idea to omit declarations that, while
Sascha> technically redundant, make the code easier to understand?
First, I didn't make this particular rule. As I recall in libgcj we
did have all the redundant modifiers.
However, I think the rationale here is that even Sun suggests not
using these.
Well, ok, I could only find this style discouragement for modifiers
on methods. See JLS 9.4.
Tom