[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Declaring RuntimeExceptions?
|
From: |
Tom Tromey |
|
Subject: |
Re: Declaring RuntimeExceptions? |
|
Date: |
17 Sep 2003 10:17:03 -0600 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
>>>>> "Sascha" == Sascha Brawer <address@hidden> writes:
Sascha> So, should a java compiler accept the following?
Sascha> [ ... ]
Sascha> javac 1.4.1 compiles this code, but gcj 3.2 complains about the throws
Sascha> clause (of *Foo*.meth, which is a bit misleading).
BTW, this bug is gone in current cvs. It might also be fixed in 3.3,
but I didn't try it to see.
Tom
- Declaring RuntimeExceptions?, Sascha Brawer, 2003/09/11
- Re: Declaring RuntimeExceptions?, Brian Jones, 2003/09/11
- Re: Declaring RuntimeExceptions?, Ingo Prötel, 2003/09/11
- Re: Declaring RuntimeExceptions?, Otavio Pereira, 2003/09/11
- RE: Declaring RuntimeExceptions?, David Holmes, 2003/09/11
- Re: Declaring RuntimeExceptions?, Eric Blake, 2003/09/11
- Re: Declaring RuntimeExceptions?, Sascha Brawer, 2003/09/11
- Re: Declaring RuntimeExceptions?, Stephen Crawley, 2003/09/11
- RE: Declaring RuntimeExceptions?, David Holmes, 2003/09/11
- Re: Declaring RuntimeExceptions?,
Tom Tromey <=
Re: Declaring RuntimeExceptions?, Tom Tromey, 2003/09/11