[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues
|
From: |
Andrew Haley |
|
Subject: |
Re: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues |
|
Date: |
Sun, 4 Apr 2004 15:22:31 +0100 |
Mark Wielaard writes:
>
> As Andrew says we could maybe just use long if we want to store an
> address. Andrew also worked hard on getting SWT (Eclipse) 64 bit clean.
> What I have seen from the (huge) patch this was mainly done by turning
> addresses as stored by JNI from int to long. BTW, was this work ever
> accepted into Eclipse?
It's in Eclipse 3, but it's not totally stable yet. See
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=37775 for all the gory
details.
Andrew.
- Re: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, (continued)
- Re: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, Andrew Haley, 2004/04/06
- Re: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, Etienne Gagnon, 2004/04/05
- Re: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, Andrew Haley, 2004/04/05
- Re: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, Michael Koch, 2004/04/05
- Re: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, Andrew Haley, 2004/04/05
- Re: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, Andrew Haley, 2004/04/05
Re: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues,
Andrew Haley <=
Re: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, Mark Wielaard, 2004/04/04
RE: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/04/05
RE: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/04/05
RE: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/04/06
RE: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/04/07