[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit
From: |
Roman Kennke |
Subject: |
Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Mar 2005 19:34:11 +0100 |
I have started to write an RTF parser with antlr, based upon the RTF
spec:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnrtfspec/html/rtfspec.asp
which is quite easy and fun. When I have this ready, I will include both
the antlr sources and the generated .java files in the classpath source
tree, so that we have no additional dependency. The question here is, is
it necessary that the generated .java files are formatted and commented
just like normal source files? This can easily become a maintainence
nightmare... What are your opinions?
/Roman
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
- javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit, Roman Kennke, 2005/03/03
- Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit, Sven de Marothy, 2005/03/03
- Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit, Dalibor Topic, 2005/03/03
- Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit, Sven de Marothy, 2005/03/03
- Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit,
Roman Kennke <=
- Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit, Dalibor Topic, 2005/03/03
- Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit, Mark Wielaard, 2005/03/04
- Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit, Roman Kennke, 2005/03/04
Re: javax.swing.text.rtf.RTFEditorKit, Roman Kennke, 2005/03/03