[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Shouldn't be java.nio.channels

From: Michael Koch
Subject: Re: Shouldn't be java.nio.channels.VMFileChannel ?
Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 19:43:16 +0200
User-agent: mutt-ng 1.5.9-r265i (Debian)

On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 07:10:02PM +0200, Ewout Prangsma wrote:
> Hi all,
> Based on the VMxxx class guidelines, shouldn't the FileChannelImpl class in 
> not be VMFileChannel in 
> java.nio.channels?

Not totally. Onlz the VM specific parts should be moved into a VMxxxx class.
This means mostly only the native methods should be moved as some of java code
its generic. Its not done zet due to time and syncing constraints.

I will do it before the next release.

Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath!

Join the community at

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]