Re: Patch for Jikes 1.22

[Mark Wielaard]

Hi,

On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 17:00 +1000, Stephen Crawley wrote:
> The problem occurs when I build the Kissme core classes against Classpath.

Aha. Sorry, yes, I am seeing that too.
But I worked around it by removing the +U from the kissme Makefile.

Cheers,

Mark

Index: Makefile.am
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/kissme/Makefile.am,v
retrieving revision 1.50
diff -u -r1.50 Makefile.am
--- Makefile.am 21 Dec 2004 15:21:21 -0000      1.50
+++ Makefile.am 5 Jul 2005 07:10:51 -0000
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
 if CAN_COMPILE_KCP
        find @KCP_DIR@ -name '*.class' -exec rm {} ';'
        cd @KCP_DIR@ ; \
-         $(JAVAC) +U -classpath $(KCP_BUILD_CLASSPATH) \
+         $(JAVAC) -classpath $(KCP_BUILD_CLASSPATH) \
          `find . -name '*.java'`
 else
        @echo Sorry ... you do not appear to have Kissme Classpath source code
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
        if ! test -d classes ; then mkdir classes ; fi
        rm -f `find classes -name \*.class`
        cd $(top_srcdir)/classes ; \
-         $(JAVAC_BOOT) +U -classpath $(KISSME_BUILD_CLASSPATH) -d 
@abs_builddir@/classes \
+         $(JAVAC_BOOT) -classpath $(KISSME_BUILD_CLASSPATH) -d 
@abs_builddir@/classes \
            `find $(KISSME_PACKAGES) -name '*.java'`
        cd $(top_builddir)/classes
 else

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part