|
From: | David Brownell |
Subject: | Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities |
Date: | Tue, 25 Feb 2003 18:31:32 -0800 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020513 |
I have chosen `gnu.xml.libxmlj' as package root for this project, `gnu.xml.libxmlj.transform' as package name for the XSL transformation part, and I'll use `libxmlj' as CVS module name. OK?That's great.
Yep -- a fine thing to have. I've never been a rabid believer in "100% Pure Java", and javax.xml.transform using libxslt sounds like like it should be good. How does that compare (speed and memory) with the typical 100% pure implementations? - db
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |