RE: Where to get your password from.

[Kolarik, Tony]

Well I see we finally have an list archive!  

Any chance we can grandfather in someone's personal list archive?

Anyhow, putting up with a couple of extra messages is nothing compared to
getting this archive.  Thanks,
 -- Tony K.




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rajesh Vaidheeswarran [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 10:15 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Where to get your password from.
> 
> 
> Folks,
> 
> Apparently, when the list got imported into mailman,
> every one was assigned a random password.
> 
> To get that please goto the page
> 
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/cons-discuss
> 
> Enter the email address that you subscribed with, into the box under
> 
> "To change your subscription (set options like digest and delivery
> modes, get a reminder of your password, or unsubscribe from
> Cons-discuss), enter your subscription email address:"
> 
> in the `cons-discuss' subscribers section. One of the options 
> that it will
> offer is "Forgotten password?"
> 
> rv
> 
> PS: I'm not sure the multiple email problem has been fixed yet. Thanks
>     for your patience.
> _______________________________________________
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/cons-discuss
> Cons URL: http://www.dsmit.com/cons/
> 
>From address@hidden Mon Sep 25 05:33:42 2000
Received: from fwall.iar.se ([195.84.156.2])
        by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian))
        id 13dUdq-0002S7-00
        for <address@hidden>; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 05:33:42 -0400
Received: (from address@hidden) by fwall.iar.se (8.7.1/8.7.1) id LAA20541 for 
<address@hidden>; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 11:33:36 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from pjakkur.iar.se(192.9.201.1) by fwall.iar.se via smap (V2.0)
        id xma020495; Mon, 25 Sep 00 11:33:14 +0200
Received: from localhost (address@hidden)
        by pjakkur.iar.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA09522
        for <address@hidden>; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 11:33:12 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 11:33:12 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Johan Holmberg <address@hidden>
X-Sender: address@hidden
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Cons-discuss] TAGS anyone? (long, sorry)
In-Reply-To: <address@hidden>
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: address@hidden
Errors-To: address@hidden
X-BeenThere: address@hidden
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:address@hidden>
List-Post: <mailto:address@hidden>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/cons-discuss>, 
<mailto:address@hidden>
List-Id: Discussion list for the GNU Software Construction System 
<cons-discuss.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/cons-discuss>, 
<mailto:address@hidden>
List-Archive: http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/cons-discuss/

On 21 Sep 2000, Doug Alcorn wrote:
> 
> Johan Holmberg <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > #----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > sub cons::TagsFile
> > {
> >     my($env) = shift;
> >     my($tgt) = $dir::cwd->lookupfile($env->_subst(shift));
> >     my($progenv) = $env->_resolve($tgt);
> >     $tgt->bind(find build::command::linkedmodule($progenv,
> >                                                  $progenv->{TAGSCOM}),
> >            map($dir::cwd->lookupfile($env->_subst($_)), @_));
> > }
> > #----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I don't really understand how this actually works.  I though I could
> just "plug-n-chug".  However, after setting up all my Conscripts to
> use it I have a few questions.
> 
> First, this function doesn't print out the command as it's executing.
> I like to see what's going on.
[...]
> 
> Specifically, before I put in the check of -f $file I was getting
> complaints from cons about not knowing how to build
> 'subdir1/someheader.h' or 'common/anotherheader.h'.  Also, when I do
> 'cons TAGS' sometimes it goes off compiling some of my source files
> into objects.  That's not what I expected at all.
> 

Instead of answering your questions directly, here are some general
remarks:

- commands are always printed as they are executed (unless "@" is
  used as the first character of the command)
  If you don't see the command, I don't think it is executed.

- The "TagsFile" rule worked in my example. I tested it with the
  latest development release of cons.

- your should NOT have to test if a file exist with -f.
  Also note that cons does NOT change diretory to the directories
  of called Conscript files, so your usage of -f would
  probably always give false as answer.

- have you used "cons -pa . " to see if cons and you have the same
  view of what you have told cons ?
  My experience is that if cons does the wrong thing, it's usually
  because one has told it to do the wrong thing ;-)


/Johan Holmberg