[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Desired feature: Conscript-uptodate targets
From: |
Zachary Deretsky |
Subject: |
RE: Desired feature: Conscript-uptodate targets |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Nov 2000 13:17:25 -0800 |
> The problem with this is that things normally get built in whatever
> order works, not conscript-by-conscript. Forcing this could cause
> unsolvable dependency conflicts (you say ConscriptA depends on
> ConscriptB, but something in ConscriptB depends on something in
> ConscriptA, for instance).
I thought about circular dependencies, but aren't they handled already
by as errors cons? One can easily create them now with regular targets
and sources.
Z.
- Re: Could you share and shed some wisdom?, Steven Knight, 2000/11/29
- Could you share and shed some more wisdom?, Zachary Deretsky, 2000/11/29
- Re: Could you share and shed some more wisdom?, Steven Knight, 2000/11/29
- Re: Could you share and shed some more wisdom?, Gary Oberbrunner, 2000/11/30
- Desired feature: Conscript-uptodate targets, Zachary Deretsky, 2000/11/30
- Re: Desired feature: Conscript-uptodate targets, Gary Oberbrunner, 2000/11/30
- RE: Desired feature: Conscript-uptodate targets,
Zachary Deretsky <=
- Remark 2: Desired feature: Conscript-uptodate targets, Zachary Deretsky, 2000/11/30
- Re: Remark 2: Desired feature: Conscript-uptodate targets, Steven Knight, 2000/11/30