cons-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PATH & Perl 5.6 on Win32 ?


From: Trent Mick
Subject: Re: PATH & Perl 5.6 on Win32 ?
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 17:01:10 -0700
User-agent: Mutt/1.2i

On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 10:26:39AM -0700, Eric Brown wrote:
> It's definitely a bug in ActiveState Perl 5.6 (up to and including build
> 623).  If you want, I can send you a patch to the Perl sources that fixes
> the problem.
> 
> I've sent a message to ActiveState, and it's in their bug system (#1342),
> but in 4 months, it hasn't been assigned to a developer to fix.

c.f. http://bugs.activestate.com/ActivePerl/incoming?id=1342

I had Sarathy (the ActivePerl main dude here) take a quick look at it.
Unfortunately he could not find the problem in Perl (if indeed that is where
the problem is).

I can (weakly) say that it (modifying PATH and using it) works in Python.
Maybe Steven Knight can finish up ScCons
(http://software-carpentry.codesourcery.com/entries/build/ScCons/ScCons.html)
real quick so we can use it. :)



[Sarathy]:
> AFAIK, this is not a perl bug.
> 
>     C:\> copy con penv.c
>     #include <stdio.h>
> 
>     int
>     main(int argc, char **argv, char **env)
>     {
>         printf("PATH=%s\n", getenv("PATH"));
>         return 0;
>     }
>     ^Z
>     C:\> cl penv.c
>     Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 12.00.8168 for
> 80x86
>     Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp 1984-1998. All rights reserved.
> 
>     penv.c
>     Microsoft (R) Incremental Linker Version 6.00.8447
>     Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp 1992-1998. All rights reserved.
> 
>     /out:penv.exe
>     penv.obj
>     C:\> perl -we "$ENV{PATH} = 'xyz'; system './penv'"
>     PATH=xyz
>     C:\> perl -v
> 
>     This is perl, v5.6.0 built for MSWin32-x86-multi-thread
>     (with 1 registered patch, see perl -V for more detail)
> 
>     Copyright 1987-2000, Larry Wall
> 
>     Binary build 620 provided by ActiveState Tool Corp.
> http://www.ActiveState.com
>     Built 18:31:05 Oct 31 2000
> 
> I suspect this is Windows NT/2000 playing tricks with the "user" environment
> vs. the "system" environment under the covers...



Trent

-- 
Trent Mick
address@hidden



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]