[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: true path
From: |
Steven_Shaw |
Subject: |
Re: true path |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Apr 2001 16:42:55 +1000 |
> However, it seems to me that you're making extra work for yourself.
> What's wrong with listing the directories that store your libraries in
> LIBPATH? You should then be able to list your libraries using LIBS =>
> '-lsdm -ltux_s' and have Cons do the %SUFLIB expansion for you...
Too right I'm making extra work for myself! I'm now using LIBPATH and LIBS with
the '-l'. Everything is good.
> Oh, wait, this looks like you're on Windows NT, right? Rajesh just
> hit upon the fact that the -llib idiom doesn't work as you'd expect
> there. There's an undocumented hack for NT that Jochen Schwarze added
> a long time ago; if you use the construction variable %_LIBS (note the
> underscore) in your LINKCOM command, you can use -llib and have it
> expand properly.
I'm on AIX at the moment but will be eventually porting to Solaris, HP-UX, Linux
and NT.
cheers,
Steve.
- true path, Steven_Shaw, 2001/04/27
- Re: true path,
Steven_Shaw <=