[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: javac issues
From: |
Peter Vogel |
Subject: |
RE: javac issues |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Dec 2001 19:13:13 -0800 |
Check out "ant" http://jakarta.apache.org/ant
Not that I like it all that much, but it does what you suggest.
Seems like Cons could do it with a little effort, take a look
at the code for the javac task for a leg up.
-Peter
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Cook [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 8:26 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: javac issues
>
>
> has anyone any experience using cons with javac? javac has
> considerable startup overhead. so, invoking javac once with 100
> *.java files is much (!) quicker than invoking javac 100 times once
> per file.
>
> if only some of the 100 *.java files need to be re-compiled, ideally
> cons could figure out which need to be recompiled and then invoke
> javac only once and passing only that subset of the files.
>
> thoughts?
>
> m.
>
> _______________________________________________
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/cons-discuss
> Cons URL: http://www.dsmit.com/cons/
>