[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Possible error in dependency checking a lots of other points
From: |
Brad Garcia |
Subject: |
Re: Possible error in dependency checking a lots of other points |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Jan 2002 11:55:04 -0500 (EST) |
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Steven Knight wrote:
> > *** extension
> > Could we have a default extension for the Construct and
> > conscript files so one could get a fancy icon under Win32 and The
> > possibility to click it to jump in an editor with perl support.
>
> That'd be pretty cool. I'd be willing to integrate a change that would
> looks for Construct.xxx as well as Construct.
>
> In the Windows world, how do you go about picking a suffix that you know
> doesn't conflict with a suffix some other application is using?
How about (drumroll please...)
.pl ?
> Tell you what, I'll look at something like this if you stop putting
> more than 80 characters on a line. Oh, wait, you apparently don't like
> having to accomodate "UNIX cave man..."
Uh oh. You got Steven mad now. ;^)
(but I'll second the 80-column rule. I still work from text terminals
on occasion).
> > The rule is simple and it works: ^\t*[^\t]*$
> > -set the tab size, you like, in your editor
> > -use only tabs for alignement before the firs non-space character
> > -after the firs non-space charater use only spaces to align
Ah.... no.
> You can't solve this problem by trying to pretend that an 8-space stop
> isn't the norm.
Exactly.
The standard is that tab size is 8 characters.
But I do NOT want my code lines indented by 8 characters!
I'm ok with either using all spaces, or with assuming 8 character tabs.
And code should be indented by 4 spaces for each level (well, cons itself
should be, since it already is this way).
You probably need to get a new text editor, Nadim.
Us Unix cavemen use editors that can deal with sub-tab indents. :^)
Brad Garcia
- Possible error in dependency checking a lots of other points, Nadim Khemir, 2002/01/23
- Re: Possible error in dependency checking a lots of other points, Steven Knight, 2002/01/23
- RE: Possible error in dependency checking a lots of other points, Greg Spencer, 2002/01/23
- RE: Possible error in dependency checking a lots of other points, Charles Crain, 2002/01/23
- RE: Possible error in dependency checking a lots of other points, Greg Spencer, 2002/01/23
- Re: Possible error in dependency checking a lots of other points, Michael Polis, 2002/01/23
- Re: Possible error in dependency checking a lots of other points, Brad Garcia, 2002/01/23
- RE: Possible error in dependency checking a lots of other points, Greg Spencer, 2002/01/23
- RE: Possible error in dependency checking a lots of other points, Charles Crain, 2002/01/23
Re: Possible error in dependency checking a lots of other points,
Brad Garcia <=
Re: Possible error in dependency checking a lots of other points, Johan Holmberg, 2002/01/25
Re: Possible error in dependency checking a lots of other points, Johan Holmberg, 2002/01/25