[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dependency flaw in cons (and scons) ?
From: |
Johan Holmberg |
Subject: |
Re: Dependency flaw in cons (and scons) ? |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Feb 2002 10:37:58 +0100 (MET) |
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Frank Thomas wrote:
>
> Am Montag den, 25. Februar 2002, um 10:03, schrieb Johan Holmberg:
> >> Or maybe the target filename should be added as part of the build
> >> signature?
> > This seems like a *very good* way to solve this issue.
> >
> > I can't see any drawbacks.
> > Can anyone else ?
>
> The question is how much of the filename you'd like to take. If you take
> to much the repository won't work any longer. If you take too few you
> might just shift the problem to "create 2 files with the same name in
> different directories" (well, who would do that??)
>
If the "logical path" (ie. the relative path within the repository)
was used, wouldn't that be OK ?
Isn't that value the same regardless of if/how a repository is used ?
/Johan Holmberg
- Dependency flaw in cons (and scons) ?, Johan Holmberg, 2002/02/21
- Re: Dependency flaw in cons (and scons) ?, Steven Knight, 2002/02/21
- Re: Dependency flaw in cons (and scons) ?, Johan Holmberg, 2002/02/22
- Re: Dependency flaw in cons (and scons) ?, Brad Garcia, 2002/02/22
- Re: Dependency flaw in cons (and scons) ?, Johan Holmberg, 2002/02/25
- Re: Dependency flaw in cons (and scons) ?, Frank Thomas, 2002/02/25
- Re: Dependency flaw in cons (and scons) ?,
Johan Holmberg <=
- Re: Dependency flaw in cons (and scons) ?, Brad Garcia, 2002/02/25
- Re: Dependency flaw in cons (and scons) ?, Johan Holmberg, 2002/02/25
- Re: Dependency flaw in cons (and scons) ?, Brad Garcia, 2002/02/25