cons-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: command dependencies broken


From: Johan Holmberg
Subject: Re: command dependencies broken
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 22:01:51 +0200 (MEST)

On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Timothee Besset wrote:
>
> The cvs version isn't so broken. The only issue I know about it is the
> Install / InstallAs problem (also known as command dependencies). I use
> cons from cvs patched with pcons patch all day long, and I'd just want
> this to be fixed before it's declared stable and good for a final release.
>

I'm very confused by your mail.
Have you forgotten the discussion about a month ago
(which you took part in) ?

See for example my mail:

    http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/cons-discuss/2002-June/001898.html


The problem there applies to both 2.3.0 and the latest version via CVS.

I think it is a *very serious* bug.
I think 2.3.0 and later (including the latest from CVS) is totally
useless if you want to build anything reliably.

I though everybody agreed on that !!!??


/Johan Holmberg





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]