Re: Split cons code (was: Re: Debian package and development of CONS)

[rick . croote]

On Sept. 6, 2002, I submitted a message to this group that included source that has since fixed my dependency problems with the Command method.  We have been using Cons 2.3.0 and we are very happy with the performance and reliability.  
---
Rick Croote

Johan Holmberg <address@hidden> Sent by: address@hidden 09/05/2003 12:00 AM

To:        Pierre THIERRY <address@hidden>         cc:        address@hidden (bcc: Rick Croote/ATL-BTL/MS/PHILIPS)         Subject:        Re: Split cons code (was: Re: Debian package and development of CONS)         Classification:

Pierre THIERRY <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> In fact, in the Debian package I'm creating with 2.3.0, [...]
>

Is it really a good idea to distribute 2.3.0 ?
The dependency code in that version is broken.

This was discussed at length between 26/6 and 30/7 last year (2002).
Read the threads with subjects:

    "Command Dependecies broken"     (yes a typo here)
    "command dependencies broken"

for example my mail from 30/7:

    http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/cons-discuss/2002-07/msg00007.html


/Johan Holmberg



_______________________________________________
address@hidden
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/cons-discuss
Cons URL: http://www.dsmit.com/cons/