[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CONS specs update?
From: |
Pierre THIERRY |
Subject: |
Re: CONS specs update? |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Jun 2004 21:24:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i |
> Just wondering if anyone has made any progress on the CONS spec? This
> thread has been silent for a while.
I'm on the structure of the new CONS system, but I was just too busy
last week to finish it.
In the meantime, If some people could write how a build must happen for
their favorite language, this would be great. I quickly installed a Wiki
for this purpose:
http://arcanes.fr.eu.org/~pierre/CONS%20revival/Wiki/index.cgi?SpecificBuilds
No matter if many build descriptions are redundant, the main goal is to
have a broad view of what CONS will have to be able to do. The more
descriptions we have, the more chances we have to not forget something
important in CONS structure.
> I'd hate to see yet another effort to revive Cons drop flat.
Me too. ;-)
Busily,
le Moine Fou
--
address@hidden
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- CONS specs update?, H. S. Teoh, 2004/06/15
- Re: CONS specs update?,
Pierre THIERRY <=
- Re: CONS specs update?, H. S. Teoh, 2004/06/16
- Re: CONS specs update?, Pierre THIERRY, 2004/06/19
- Re: CONS specs update?, H. S. Teoh, 2004/06/24
- Re: CONS specs update?, Vaclav Barta, 2004/06/25
- Re: CONS specs update?, H. S. Teoh, 2004/06/25
- Re: CONS specs update?, Vaclav Barta, 2004/06/28
- Re: CONS specs update?, Pierre THIERRY, 2004/06/27