consensus
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNU/consensus] [SocialSwarm-D] Secure communication tools and the o


From: Per Guth
Subject: Re: [GNU/consensus] [SocialSwarm-D] Secure communication tools and the obligation to use them
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 20:00:37 +0100

Hello,

thanks for your efforts!

Since many of those tools get rebuild using web technology[1], it seems plausible to me to add something like "trustability (of the source code)". Meaning eg: Is there a reliable way to check the integrity of the source code? Any kind of warrantor? Is there a reliable history of all changes?

That is a field we can work on and I see some innovation:

*For websites*
https://github.com/substack/hyperboot
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9_VaU4N3Rg

*For browser extensions*
Search for "auditable static versions" in:
https://whiteout.io/security.html

Viele Gruesse, Per

[1]: Eg. with small tech explorations like mine:
https://github.com/pguth/peertransfer
https://github.com/pguth/peermesh
Or with professional solutions like Firefox Hello.
*** In another exchange leaked [...], Zuckerberg explained to a friend that his control of Facebook gave him access to any information he wanted [...]: ZUCK: yea so if you ever need info about anyone at harvard ZUCK: just ask ZUCK: i have over 4000 emails, pictures, addresses, sns FRIEND: what!? how’d you manage that one? ZUCK: people just submitted it ZUCK: i don’t know why ZUCK: they “trust me” ZUCK: dumb fucks - http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/09/20/the-face-of-facebook

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]