[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Cvs-cvs] Changes to ccvs/windows-NT/config.h.in.footer
From: |
Conrad T . Pino |
Subject: |
[Cvs-cvs] Changes to ccvs/windows-NT/config.h.in.footer |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Sep 2005 20:55:44 -0400 |
Index: ccvs/windows-NT/config.h.in.footer
diff -u ccvs/windows-NT/config.h.in.footer:1.10
ccvs/windows-NT/config.h.in.footer:1.11
--- ccvs/windows-NT/config.h.in.footer:1.10 Fri Sep 23 00:51:37 2005
+++ ccvs/windows-NT/config.h.in.footer Fri Sep 23 00:55:44 2005
@@ -35,6 +35,12 @@
it because _open_osfhandle doesn't work. */
#define NO_SOCKET_TO_FD 1
+/* Is this true on NT? Seems like I remember reports that NT 3.51 has
+ problems with 200K writes (of course, the issue of large writes is
+ moot since the use of buffer.c ensures that writes will only be as big
+ as the buffers). */
+#define SEND_NEVER_PARTIAL 1
+
/* Stop server macro */
#define SHUTDOWN_SERVER wnt_shutdown_server
@@ -64,12 +70,6 @@
/* Macro name tells the story */
#define SYSTEM_INITIALIZE(pargc,pargv) woe32_init_winsock()
-
-/* Is this true on NT? Seems like I remember reports that NT 3.51 has
- problems with 200K writes (of course, the issue of large writes is
- moot since the use of buffer.c ensures that writes will only be as big
- as the buffers). */
-#define SEND_NEVER_PARTIAL 1
/*
* According to GNU conventions, we should avoid referencing any macro
- [Cvs-cvs] Changes to ccvs/windows-NT/config.h.in.footer,
Conrad T . Pino <=