cvs-cvs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Cvs-cvs] Changes to ccvs/windows-NT/config.h.in.footer


From: Conrad T . Pino
Subject: [Cvs-cvs] Changes to ccvs/windows-NT/config.h.in.footer
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 20:55:44 -0400

Index: ccvs/windows-NT/config.h.in.footer
diff -u ccvs/windows-NT/config.h.in.footer:1.10 
ccvs/windows-NT/config.h.in.footer:1.11
--- ccvs/windows-NT/config.h.in.footer:1.10     Fri Sep 23 00:51:37 2005
+++ ccvs/windows-NT/config.h.in.footer  Fri Sep 23 00:55:44 2005
@@ -35,6 +35,12 @@
    it because _open_osfhandle doesn't work.  */
 #define NO_SOCKET_TO_FD 1
 
+/* Is this true on NT?  Seems like I remember reports that NT 3.51 has
+   problems with 200K writes (of course, the issue of large writes is
+   moot since the use of buffer.c ensures that writes will only be as big
+   as the buffers).  */
+#define SEND_NEVER_PARTIAL 1
+
 /* Stop server macro */
 #define SHUTDOWN_SERVER wnt_shutdown_server
 
@@ -64,12 +70,6 @@
 
 /* Macro name tells the story */
 #define SYSTEM_INITIALIZE(pargc,pargv) woe32_init_winsock()
-
-/* Is this true on NT?  Seems like I remember reports that NT 3.51 has
-   problems with 200K writes (of course, the issue of large writes is
-   moot since the use of buffer.c ensures that writes will only be as big
-   as the buffers).  */
-#define SEND_NEVER_PARTIAL 1
 
 /*
  * According to GNU conventions, we should avoid referencing any macro




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]