[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Cvs-cvs] ccvs/windows-NT ChangeLog config.h config.h.in ...
From: |
Mark D. Baushke |
Subject: |
[Cvs-cvs] ccvs/windows-NT ChangeLog config.h config.h.in ... |
Date: |
Sat, 13 May 2006 15:18:46 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /cvsroot/cvs
Module name: ccvs
Branch:
Changes by: Mark D. Baushke <address@hidden> 06/05/13 15:18:46
Modified files:
windows-NT : ChangeLog config.h config.h.in
config.h.in.footer
Log message:
* config.h.in.footer: Add #define OK_TO_USE_1S_CLOCK to restore
the ability to compile gettime.c.
* config.h.in, config.h: Ditto.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/cvs/ccvs/windows-NT/ChangeLog.diff?tr1=1.350&tr2=1.351&r1=text&r2=text
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/cvs/ccvs/windows-NT/config.h.diff?tr1=1.181&tr2=1.182&r1=text&r2=text
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/cvs/ccvs/windows-NT/config.h.in.diff?tr1=1.109&tr2=1.110&r1=text&r2=text
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/cvs/ccvs/windows-NT/config.h.in.footer.diff?tr1=1.13&tr2=1.14&r1=text&r2=text
Patches:
Index: ccvs/windows-NT/ChangeLog
diff -u ccvs/windows-NT/ChangeLog:1.350 ccvs/windows-NT/ChangeLog:1.351
--- ccvs/windows-NT/ChangeLog:1.350 Thu Mar 30 18:13:12 2006
+++ ccvs/windows-NT/ChangeLog Sat May 13 15:18:45 2006
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2006-05-13 Mark D. Baushke <address@hidden>
+
+ * config.h.in.footer: Add #define OK_TO_USE_1S_CLOCK to restore
+ the ability to compile gettime.c.
+ * config.h.in, config.h: Ditto.
+
2006-03-30 Mark D. Baushke <address@hidden>
* stdint.h: Regenerated.
Index: ccvs/windows-NT/config.h
diff -u ccvs/windows-NT/config.h:1.181 ccvs/windows-NT/config.h:1.182
--- ccvs/windows-NT/config.h:1.181 Tue May 9 01:55:21 2006
+++ ccvs/windows-NT/config.h Sat May 13 15:18:46 2006
@@ -1463,6 +1463,9 @@
it because _open_osfhandle doesn't work. */
#define NO_SOCKET_TO_FD 1
+/* 1-second nominal clock resolution is okay. */
+#define OK_TO_USE_1S_CLOCK 1
+
/* Is this true on NT? Seems like I remember reports that NT 3.51 has
problems with 200K writes (of course, the issue of large writes is
moot since the use of buffer.c ensures that writes will only be as big
Index: ccvs/windows-NT/config.h.in
diff -u ccvs/windows-NT/config.h.in:1.109 ccvs/windows-NT/config.h.in:1.110
--- ccvs/windows-NT/config.h.in:1.109 Tue May 9 01:55:21 2006
+++ ccvs/windows-NT/config.h.in Sat May 13 15:18:46 2006
@@ -1456,6 +1456,9 @@
it because _open_osfhandle doesn't work. */
#define NO_SOCKET_TO_FD 1
+/* 1-second nominal clock resolution is okay. */
+#define OK_TO_USE_1S_CLOCK 1
+
/* Is this true on NT? Seems like I remember reports that NT 3.51 has
problems with 200K writes (of course, the issue of large writes is
moot since the use of buffer.c ensures that writes will only be as big
Index: ccvs/windows-NT/config.h.in.footer
diff -u ccvs/windows-NT/config.h.in.footer:1.13
ccvs/windows-NT/config.h.in.footer:1.14
--- ccvs/windows-NT/config.h.in.footer:1.13 Mon Sep 26 20:25:18 2005
+++ ccvs/windows-NT/config.h.in.footer Sat May 13 15:18:46 2006
@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@
it because _open_osfhandle doesn't work. */
#define NO_SOCKET_TO_FD 1
+/* 1-second nominal clock resolution is okay. */
+#define OK_TO_USE_1S_CLOCK 1
+
/* Is this true on NT? Seems like I remember reports that NT 3.51 has
problems with 200K writes (of course, the issue of large writes is
moot since the use of buffer.c ensures that writes will only be as big
- [Cvs-cvs] ccvs/windows-NT ChangeLog config.h config.h.in ...,
Mark D. Baushke <=