[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Cvs-dev] Re: Result of CVS Coverity scan, via NetBSD
From: |
Mark D. Baushke |
Subject: |
Re: [Cvs-dev] Re: Result of CVS Coverity scan, via NetBSD |
Date: |
Fri, 12 May 2006 06:09:46 -0700 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Christos,
Is it possible for the Coverity folks to re-run the checks for xcvs, but
for them to use the correct model for xstrdup (the one from the
src/subr.c file) rather than the one from src/usr.bin/xlint/common/mem.c
which it somehow believes is correct?
Many of these CIDs are actually false positivies due to xcvs using a
version of xstrdup that handles a NULL argument without dereferencing
it.
-- Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFEZIkaCg7APGsDnFERAmzjAJ9UDFWXYWAXLEJZH4cmwdHQOZTWJACdF4ld
7nNh0WtDOeB/3zIPo3kIepw=
=tcgH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [Cvs-dev] Re: Result of CVS Coverity scan, via NetBSD, Mark D. Baushke, 2006/05/11
- [Cvs-dev] Re: Result of CVS Coverity scan, via NetBSD, Christos Zoulas, 2006/05/12
- Re: [Cvs-dev] Re: Result of CVS Coverity scan, via NetBSD,
Mark D. Baushke <=
- Re: [Cvs-dev] Re: Result of CVS Coverity scan, via NetBSD, Christos Zoulas, 2006/05/15
- Re: [Cvs-dev] Re: Result of CVS Coverity scan, via NetBSD, Mark D. Baushke, 2006/05/12
- Re: [Cvs-dev] Re: Result of CVS Coverity scan, via NetBSD, Christos Zoulas, 2006/05/15
- Re: [Cvs-dev] Re: Result of CVS Coverity scan, via NetBSD, Mark D. Baushke, 2006/05/12
- Re: [Cvs-dev] Re: Result of CVS Coverity scan, via NetBSD, Christos Zoulas, 2006/05/15
- Re: [Cvs-dev] Re: Result of CVS Coverity scan, via NetBSD, Mark D. Baushke, 2006/05/12