Re: [Cvs-dev] CVS maintenance question

[Thorsten Glaser]

Petr Pisar dixit:

>Fedora choose 1.11.23 because it's a stable release. I occassionally see some
>complains about 1.12 bugs that does not present in 1.11.

FSVO stable anyway. Can you compile a list of those reports/bugs
and forward them to me, out of interest? I fixed a few of them,
most annoyingly the one that prevented resurrecting a deleted
file if the repository was remote but 'cvs add' was run locally.

I’d like to try and reproduce these issues with my current
codebase and possibly bisect against 1.11 (which I have no
interest in going back to, 1.11.1p1 was CVS “dark ages”).

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
„Cool, /usr/share/doc/mksh/examples/uhr.gz ist ja ein Grund,
mksh auf jedem System zu installieren.“
        -- XTaran auf der OpenRheinRuhr, ganz begeistert
(EN: “[…]uhr.gz is a reason to install mksh on every system.”)