ddd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cannot compile DDD 3.2.1 (PannedGE.C:88: non-lvalue in unary `&')


From: Bernhard Mogens Ege
Subject: Re: Cannot compile DDD 3.2.1 (PannedGE.C:88: non-lvalue in unary `&')
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 11:13:51 +0100 (MET)

>>>>> "Andreas" == Andreas Zeller <address@hidden> writes:

> GCC 2.96 is.  This is fixed in the current GCC snapshot, but not
> yet part of an official release.

> In the meantime, try the following patch.  As soon as anyone confirms
> this is working, I'll place it on the DDD Web page.

[patch snipped]

I applied the patch to the 2.1.91 release and PannedGE.C compiled
with no problems.

The only compilation problems (warnings) I see is this:

c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I./.. -isystem /usr/X11R6/include    -DNDEBUG 
-O2 -g -W -Wall -trigraphs  -c VSLRead.C
In file included from VSLRead.C:114:
/usr/lib/bison.simple: In function `int VSLLib_parse ()':
/usr/lib/bison.simple:324: warning: unused variable `YYSTYPE *vslvs1'
/usr/lib/bison.simple:614: warning: comparison between signed and 
unsigned integer expressions
/usr/lib/bison.simple:626: warning: comparison between signed and 
unsigned integer expressions

And this:

c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I./.. -isystem /usr/X11R6/include    -DNDEBUG 
-O2 -g -W -Wall -trigraphs  -c hostname.C
hostname.C: In function `char *_fullhostname (char *)':
hostname.C:176: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer 
expressions

And this: 

c++ -DNDEBUG -O2 -g -W -Wall -trigraphs -o ddd ddd.o [snippped a bunch 
of .o files] WhatNextCB.o -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lXm -lXp -lXpm -lXaw -lXmu -lXext 
-lXt -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lncurses -liberty -lm
ddd.o: In function `GetFileDatabase(char *)':
/pack/ddd-3.2.91/src/ddd-3.2.91/ddd/strclass.h:908: the use of `tmpnam' is 
dangerous, better use `mkstemp'

For a non released version, I guess thats ok. I just wanted to let you 
know.

Now I will try ddd a bit to see if it crashes or something similar.

Thanks!

regards,

Bernhard Ege



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]