[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/
From: |
H. J. Lu |
Subject: |
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?) |
Date: |
Sat, 7 Jun 2003 15:32:24 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 01:34:33PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> >>>>> H J Lu writes:
>
> HJ> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-05/msg01734.html
>
> HJ> If you ask me, this patch is 100% correct/safe.
>
> Unfortunately your confidence is incorrect. Modifying utils.exp
> as you suggested introduced a number of new regressions. I will try just
> reverting the original patch.
>
I am curious how my patch introduced new regressions in gcc. I have
been using it on gcc for several weeks without any problems. Can you
send me the testsuite logs with and without my patch?
H.J.
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?), Rob Savoye, 2003/06/06
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?), David Edelsohn, 2003/06/06
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?), Rob Savoye, 2003/06/06
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?), John David Anglin, 2003/06/06
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?), H. J. Lu, 2003/06/06
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?), Rob Savoye, 2003/06/06