[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Master sources?

From: Daniel Jacobowitz
Subject: Re: Master sources?
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 20:23:38 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 05:18:25PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 05:04:56PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> >>According to
> >>the master sources are kept at
> >>
> >>I was therefore somewhat dismayed to read that this isn't
> >>quite the case --
> >>
> >>states there's also a repository at
> >>
> >>Why are there two?
> >
> >The one at sources isn't the master.  It does, however, get a lot of
> >the active changes.
> If those active changes don't also go to savannah, then savannah isn't
> really the master, is it?
> Also, if anyone is pulling from, then savannah
> isn't really the master, is it?
> Who uses the repository at, and why?

Everyone who tests combined trees from sources.

Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]