[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Master sources?

From: Dan Kegel
Subject: Re: Master sources?
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 17:18:25 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020615 Debian/1.0.0-3

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 05:04:56PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
According to
the master sources are kept at

I was therefore somewhat dismayed to read that this isn't
quite the case --
states there's also a repository at

Why are there two?

The one at sources isn't the master.  It does, however, get a lot of
the active changes.

If those active changes don't also go to savannah, then savannah isn't
really the master, is it?
Also, if anyone is pulling from, then savannah
isn't really the master, is it?

Who uses the repository at, and why?

I tried today to merge them; it's grossly hard.  Rob's tree has a whole
bunch of bad whitespace relative to the sources tree, for instance.

Ouch... wonder if they've ever been in sync.
- Dan

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]