Re: Master sources?

[Dan Kegel]

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > Which cvs repository is authoritative for gcc / glibc / dejagnu?
> > And which cvs repository should I pull them from if I want to test them 
> > together?
> > I would have thought the answers to those two questions would be the same,
> > but perhaps they aren't?
>
> Glibc is 100% separate.  It can't be built in a combined tree like
> everything else.
>
> I find that dejagnu 1.4.3 works well enough for my purposes, so that's
> what I usually use, and report any problems to Rob.

OK, thanks.  I'll use 1.4.3 and apply patches ad hoc as recommended
by this list prn.

Is there any advantage to using a combined tree?  I've been
unpacking gcc and binutils into separate trees, and haven't
really had any trouble.
- Dan