Re: Master sources?

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 06:00:53PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >>Which cvs repository is authoritative for gcc / glibc / dejagnu?
> >>And which cvs repository should I pull them from if I want to test them 
> >>together?
> >>I would have thought the answers to those two questions would be the same,
> >>but perhaps they aren't?
> >
> >Glibc is 100% separate.  It can't be built in a combined tree like
> >everything else.
> >
> >I find that dejagnu 1.4.3 works well enough for my purposes, so that's
> >what I usually use, and report any problems to Rob.
> 
> OK, thanks.  I'll use 1.4.3 and apply patches ad hoc as recommended
> by this list prn.
> 
> Is there any advantage to using a combined tree?  I've been
> unpacking gcc and binutils into separate trees, and haven't
> really had any trouble.

Mostly, only if you are building newlib; that's where the real
advantages are.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer