[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rethinking remote testing

From: Ben Elliston
Subject: Re: Rethinking remote testing
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 11:48:54 +1100
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 06:19:39PM -0600, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:

> The recent and ongoing discussion over is_remote (and why is that
> the only is* predicate with an underscore in the name?) and its
> less-than-entirely-accurate implementation started me thinking about
> the topic.  What would be a better way to handle remote testing?

I wondered about that, too. I will add an isremote proc that wraps
is_remote. We can then try and depreciate is_remote over the

Cheers, Ben

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]